Vivien Thweatt, La Rochefoucauld and the Seventeenth Century Concept of the Self, Genève 1980. Über Charron/Montaigne: Montaigne's concepts as Charron interpreted them tended to overshadow what Montaigne himdelf had siad and thought (p. 19)tridentinische Konkupszenzlehre: The interest in love begins with the Florentine Neo-Platonists and is not unconnected with the view taken at the sixth session of the Council of Trent (1547) that 'concupiscence hath not the formal nature of sin' (p. 33 fn.).Selbst und sozialer Bezug: La Rochefoucauld sees the self almost entirely within the context of social relationships (p. 40).amour propre: La Rochefoucauld's definition of amour propre - 'amour de soi', 'tuotes choses pour soi', 'le[s] tyran[s] des autres' - is that of radical pride in St. Augustines City of God (p. 115, Civ. Dei XIV 13 und 28)Maxime 40 des Manuskripts von Liancourt: La générosité c'est un désir de briller par des actions extraordinaires, c'est un habile et industrieux emploi du désintéressement, de la fermeté en amitié, et de la magnanimité, pour aller promptement à une grande réputation.Zu 'interêt' siehe Traité 81, 83, 149, 155, 156, 159, 160, 191, 204.La Rochefoucauld, Maxime 104: Les hommes et les affaires ont leur point de perspective (...?). Il en a qu'il faut voir de près (...) et d'autres dont on ne juge jamais si bien que quand on en est éloigné. Passions/Concupiscence und Metaphysik/Physik: The physical and the metaphysical work in tandem. For Descartes they combine to produce a saving générosité, while for Pascal they complete the corruption and the destruction of the self. In La Chambre's Caractères, the interaction of the two produce 'passions' that are no more than another name for the concupiscent and the irascible vices of the Thomist tradition (p. 244).Erbsünde: La Rochefoucauld's concept of the self is essentialy a tragic one, (...) in man's alienation from the beter part of his being and in the eternal yearning for the impossible dream of a reintegration of the self that is both the sign of his folly and his saving, but secular, grace (p. 246). |